Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Walt King's avatar

China is run by scientists and engineers, the UK is run by lawyers and financiers.

Expand full comment
HoHo's avatar

Great article. Regarding the "social credit system", it is a typical Western projection of what other countries are doing when they are doing it themselves. The original intent of the system was initiated back in the early 90s for the lack of creditworthiness when the "go-go" economy was like a western movie, anything goes. The idea was to establish something like the credit bureaus, like Equifax, TransUnion, etc., to ensure the best practices in conducting business transparently and lawfully. The whole concept was to get rid of the “low-trust” society environment.

When Pres Xi came to power, he anticipated that if China was moving to the next level, then the country had to be more stable and disciplined within the context of establishing and following the rules of law, which is needed for the world to perceive China as a stable and a nation of law. I believe this is one of the mechanisms that Pres Xi’s fight against corruption campaign. What you have explained above is correct. There is no centralized database that monitors every citizen for what he/she is doing. Basically, it is a monitor and enforcement of bad behaviors, such as conducting bad business practices, not paying fines, etc.. The negative outcome is that you will get fines, be put back in the line of the subsidy program, etc.. I believe there are about 47 different institutions that participate in such a system, ranging from local city, provincial, and national levels. The most interesting thing is majority of the enforcement is on business (like over 70 percent) (Jack Ma was a good example, another treasonous traitor who got put down, and "learned" his lesson, the government is second at 14 percent, and individuals at 10 percent. There is a website (https://www.creditchina.gov.cn/) that the public can check all the cases.

Btw, Zhao Ziyang was a traitor to the core. He was a Soros stooge. Tiananmen Square was a color revolution that was planned to put him in charge. China closed the two Soros “think tanks”, Fund for the Reform and Opening Up of China, directed by Ziyang, and kicked Soros out of China; one of the best strategic moves. I believe Ziyang was under house arrest for the rest of his life. The 863 program was actually managed by Song Jian (a very close confidant and ally to Ziyang), another treasonous traitor, who believed in the limit of growth (Club of Rome’s Malthusian crap). He had it translated into Mandarin after he came back from the conference in Helsinki and interacted with Toffler (https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-asian-studies/article/futurists-of-beijing-alvin-toffler-zhao-ziyang-and-chinas-new-technological-revolution-19791991/9C3A0A2BA1E1FEE714548E47FA351758), another Malthusian psycho. He basically initiated the “population control” disastrous policy (https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/21/chinas-population-control-holocaust/). In the end, the patriots own out, but the traitors are still lurking in the dark (so is the continuation of the anti-corruption campaign)

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?