Thanks for this post. My comment about your post is using the words written on May 27, 2021 by an author I like to quote also for his clarity and conciseness too:
I know of only one way to prevent the World War Three that is now imminent: make Israel pay for it. If in the final position of authority of one of the targeted nations, I would call in the Israeli ambassador and inform him that if my nation were forced into a war with the US, I would of course respond. However, my first retaliation would be not against the US but against Israel, that I would apply a necessary portion of my arsenal to ensure that Israel would remain uninhabitable for 500 years and that Satan’s Third Temple would never be built. It is my thesis that Israel is too important to these people to be sacrificed, and that faced with such a threat deemed credible, they would back off. With everything I know, I do not believe a third world war can be otherwise prevented.
I will of course be accused of anti-Semitism, but this is not about me; it is about a small handful of Jewish European bankers and industrialists who want a third world war to destroy the old order before the new can be installed. These people must be named and their objectives exposed. In any case, in a judicial debate of offending a few hundred people or starting a third world war, which is the greater crime?
What part will your country play in World War III? May 27, 2021
This is a comment from Mr. L. Romanoff for you on your previous article once he cannot access this Substack page:
"I was a bit sorry to see the US-China trade negotiations begin so soon. I think the US needed a few months of empty shelves and 200% price increases to inject a bit of sincerity into their negotiations. The media tell us that US importers are now panicking to import the maximum possible amount of goods from China before the 90 days expires. This will mean the shelves will be full and the warehouses filled to the ceiling. They will import everything necessary for summer goods, back-to-school goods, Hallowe'en and Christmas. This left me with an uncomfortable thought. At the end of the 90 days, the US could give the Chinese a surprise list of further demands they know the Chinese will not be able to accept. They will then accuse the Chinese of being unreasonable, and impose the high tariffs again. With the warehouses full, the US will be much more able to withstand a long trade war and China would be out in the cold. I don't know how realistic this is but, if I were Donald Trump, this is what I would do.
thanks for forwarding the note from Mr. Romanoff. I share his sentiment - China should have made the US wait a bit longer before agreeing to negotiate. But I assume the Chinese government wants to demonstrate goodwill and also abide by its pledge "the door is open for talk'. the other half of the pledge was "...but if you want to fight, we'll fight to the end". I have no doubt the Chinese government is sincere in that pledge.
that said, I am not overly concerned about Trump doublcrossing China. After all, the economic reality is what it is. Even if the US can stockpile for a year, nothing fundamental will change in the power dynamics. And China wouldn't waste the year and definitely will further proof its economy against US blackmail. At the end of the day, the US got nothing China wasn't prepared to give in Geneva. Trump, in effect, capitulated.
Prior to reading this article, I was aware of the major historical events referenced here, such as the Balfour Declaration or the boycott of German goods after organized Jewry declared war on Germany, but this is the first encounter I’ve had with a true insider’s perspective on the flow of events as purposefully driven by Jewish motives from their hand in the Treaty of Versailles through to WWII and, ultimately, the destruction of Germany. Thank you, Hua Bin, for injecting it into the conversation.
It’s unfortunate that people in the West are so thoroughly and ubiquitously indoctrinated with the false narrative of innocent Jews being methodically exterminated by German monsters for NO reason other than irrational hatred. This means most of them likely do not even possess the prerequisite knowledge to recognize the truth when neatly laid out before them, so reaching them is difficult.
This situation has literally caused a qualitative change in their thought such that trying to explain actual reality to them is equivalent to trying to explain what it’s like to perceive reality in four dimensions.
My point in this word salad is that the the speech given by this renegade Jew in 1961 is very insightful and lays out the motivations of both sides (Jews vs Germans) in a way that is still comprehensible by “normal” Westerners. While these normies would surely think what is conveyed can’t be true, the events mentioned and the facts surrounding them are easy enough to verify on the internet, so it makes the “why” a little easier to explain when discussing how things came to be as they are to others.
I personally found Mr. Bin’s post very insightful, and it added something to a conversation that has been raging for decades. It’s rare that I feel that way about any single source, let alone one that can be consumed in 10 minutes.
I appreciate your kind words. The real history is out there for people who are curious enough to find it. I always resort to a simple First Principle when reading history - does it make logical sense? Hence, I have doubts about many western mainstream narratives and "official" history, especially deep events like the world wars, JFK, 911, Fed, etc. Not all alternative accounts are necessarily true but it would be the height of naivety to buy in wholesale the stories fed to you by the deep state and its affiliated media. We should all know better by now after all the exposed lies
Oh Samuel Untermeyer the same man who financed the degenerate charlatan Scofield with his specious Bible and got it printed by all the worlds biggest presses with Rothschilds money which created the bloody idiots creed called evangelicalism and funnily stupid people like Mike Fuckabee the Christian Zionists? Christian Zionist-- what cockamamie bullshit is that? That temple is Nimrod's temple and the agenda of building that filthy temple is the same agenda that Nimrod had 4 or 5 millennia ago -waging war against the God of the bible. You see the cognitive dissonance in the theology of the whole thing - it is beyond stupid and the American white trash like the Shudras of India have IQs below 70 so that abomination of a religion exists. The other thing is that the core of the Jewish religion from when the world encounters them in Babylon Persia and Egypt is messianic vengeance and apocalytic war. Incredibly the Templar royal families of Europe especially the odious pedovore British one - supposed direct descendants of accursed Kings Saul and Solomon - let these Jews unleash apocalyptic war and messianic vengeance on the two primary warrior races of Europe - The Germans and Slavs who had outnumbered these Khazar barbarians by a factor of 100 to 1. Both these people face terminal depopulation as a result of these apocalyptic wars and messianic vengeance. The Jews by the time of Christ had avenged at scale the people of the civilisations of Babylon Persia and Egypt and so Christ and his apostles taught radical forgiveness to this loathsome godless crew and then they avenged Christ himself. Historically human civilisation had only two axes JudeoRoma and China. Unless China pulls humanity out of this dreadful existence of cycles of apocalyptic war and messianic vengeance human race has no hope. When will that happen? 2050-2150? It is civilisational and civilisation is a process. First certainly they have to build that filthy temple and unleash the greatest cycle of apocalyptic war and messianic vengeance ever. The period 2027-30 is key. Let's wait and hope.
the one and same Samuel Untermeyer who financed the fraud Cyrus Scofield. in fact, I intend to write a piece about Untermeyer who happened to write the legislation for Federal Reserve, created FTC, became the first lawyer to make a million dollars from a single case, etc. - the ultimate jewish fixer. from Untermeyer you get a long line of jewish fixers like Roy Cohn and Alan Dershowitz.
I think your historical perspective is on the mark. I would add the jews are set to take revenge on the Romans (i.e. white Europeans today) for conquering them and burning their temple. even if it would take 2 milliniums - the jews wouldnt let a grudge like this go. they do that by corrupting them from the inside and eventually subjugating them in a parasite/host relationship. this also sheds a new light on deindustrialization/financialization of the west which leads to a financier-led plutocracy where the jews excel and dominate. they have become the owner class in the west. the US is the New Jerusalem for them.
the jews tried to put their claw on China as well starting from the Opium War. the jewish opium smugglers such as the Sasoons ran the opium trade with both British India opium and the American Turkish opium. over 20,000 jews flooded Shanghai after fleeing Germany before WW2. but eventually they couldn't replicate their control the same way as in the west.
I agree the showdown between China and jew-led/owned west will come in the coming decade. That will decide the direction of human civilization for the next millinium.
I 100% agree with you, Hua Bin. The Christian West has pretty much already been bested by the chosen people, and much of the Muslim world is currently in their direct crosshairs. Yes, ultimately the great civilizational clash will be between two ancient cultures: Taoist/Confucianist China versus Talmudic diasporan Jews.
As the world seemingly moves towards some sort of New World Order, which Hobson's choice do you go with? A kinder, gentler neo Taoist/Confucianist surveillance control grid or a dark neo Talmudic Jew World Order?
I think we'll know the question in the coming decade. My optimistic side says China only needs to wait for the implosion of the jewish-controlled hegemon, without which the zionists are just pests. After all, parasites without a host have short lifespan. Still, China is gearing up for the worst case scenario. May we live in interesting times.
There was some maniac just the other day trying to rally hatred of certain countries/leaders because they are "the Roman Empire" and their goal is to destroy Israel. As if that's a reason to take against them! This person's diatribe seemed out of left field; now I learn it wasn't. Thanks for clearing that up.
Apparently I'm immoral because I think that anti-Israel aim is a net benefit.
How well do you know what all that is about? Frances Leader was the author of the specific diatribe. It seemed lunatic to me. I, like Cat, am interested in what you think--I wonder whether you might think this so-called "Roman Empire"
that FL is so against might in fact be a passel of good knights on horseback. Or at least benign, for those of us who like to live reasonable and not-corrupt lives.
Macron was and still is a Rothchild employee (literally working for Rothchild & Co. before his political career). He is a surrogate of jewish interests - no more and no less. whatever comes out of his mouth is spoonfed by his puppet-master. De Gaulle and Napoleon are rolling in their graves for the once and no more french glory.
The Holocaust narrative is predicated on 3 pillars:
1. 6 million Jews were killed in concentration camps
2. they were gassed to death
3. there was a systemic intentionality from the Nazi regime to exterminate the Jews.
Below I made some remarks about each of these pillars.
➡️ 6 million Jews
Remarkably, there seems to be no consensus among historians about the number of Jews killed, even among Jewish historians.
Examples:
The late Raul Hilberg, Holocaust expert par excellence, estimated the number at 5.1 million in his magnum opus “The Destruction of the European Jews”.
The late Gerald Reitlinger's number is about 1 million less – see his book “The Final Solution”.
Note that the Final Solution (to the “Jewish Question”) was an answer to rid Germany, and eventually Europe, of Jews by transferring them elsewhere. Various potential destinations were considered, and eventually, due to the logistics of war, Eastern Europe was found to be the most practical one.
President Roosevelt (FDR), PM Churchill, and Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, Joseph Stalin, wrote their memoirs about WW2, a cumulative 7000 pages. None of them mentions mass killings nor gassings, even though they would have gleefully used the slightest indication of it to smear the German people.
The Red Cross visited the camps and in 1948 published their report, a 3-volume, 1600 page work, no mass killings are mentioned. The report puts total deaths in the 13 biggest camps at 271,000, ½ of whom were Jews, and most of the deaths were from louse-borne typhus or malnutrition from low calorie intake, no deaths due to gassing were reported. The total deaths was revised several times, with a final number at the 15 biggest camps put at 296,081 in 1993, say 300,000, i.e. 150,000 Jews.
At Auschwitz, which is now a museum/memorial, there was a plaque stating that 4 million people had been killed there, most of whom were Jews. An assumed (by me) proportion of 90% implies 3.6 million Jews. That number was included in the Six Million allegedly killed during WW2.
In 1991 the plaque was replaced by another one that put the total number at 1½ million, or 1.4 million Jews (90%). Thus the number of Jews allegedly killed in the Auschwitz concentration camp was reduced by 2.2 million, yet the total number deceased in concentration camps under German Nazi control remained at Six Million.
➡️ Six Million gassed to death
The gas in question is a cyanide gas known as Zyklon-B. Like in the U.S., the Nazi regime used the insecticide Zyklon-B to fumigate mattresses and new inmates’ clothes against typhus-carrying lice. The fumigation chambers still show the typical Prussian Blue staining of the brick & mortar walls.
However, chambers that allegedly served as homicidal gassing spaces do not show the Prussian Blue staining.
Talking about colors: the bodies of those who are put to death using cyanide turn pink/cherry-red. There are no reports of pink bodies.
Furthermore, no scientific, i.e. fact-based, evidence has ever been provided that proves the existence of homicidal gas chambers or that homicidal gassing even took place. OTOH, plenty of fact-based evidence has been provided that proves that what allegedly served as such chambers could not technically nor physically have been used for that purpose. American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter took samples, made blueprints and schematic drawings and exhaustively photographed the sites he visited, viz. Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek. He concluded that the alleged homicidal gas chambers were never used as such. There are other reports that debunk the narrative.
Raul Hilberg stated he knew of no scientific report that shows the existence of gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory.
Nowhere in a huge, permanent “Holocaust exhibition” spanning 2 floors in the London War Museum in Lambeth does it say or imply that cyanide gas chambers had people in them.
A can of the Zyklon-B insecticide is on display – and visitors are informed it was used in the delousing chamber.
➡️ Nazi regime's systemic intentionality to exterminate Jews
There is no record of an instruction issued by either Hitler or his immediate entourage for such policy. Nevertheless, the honorable Raul Hilberg found a way around to argue that the instruction existed: telepathy.
When asked in 1983 how the extermination of European Jewry took place
without an order, Hilberg replied:
> What began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus – mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.
Holocaust icon Anne Frank and her father Otto were both in the Auschwitz camp, both fell ill with typhus and were placed in the camp’s hospital. Anne recovered and agreed to be transferred to Bergen-Belsen when the Soviet troops were approaching Auschwitz. She died of typhus in Bergen-Belsen.
Her father was too ill to be transferred and stayed in the camp, and eventually returned to the Netherlands, where he profited from his daughter’s diary that, having been overlooked by the Nazis when they arrested the family in Amsterdam, surfaced miraculously after the war. Otto Frank died in 1980.
Primo Levi was in the camp’s sanatorium with scarlet fever when the Soviets arrived. After liberation he returned to Italy where he died in 1987.
If there was a policy to exterminate Jews, why give them medical treatment to save their lives?
➡️ Conclusion
The 3 pillars of the holocaust narrative do not seem to be based on facts. Despite this, many Western countries have made it illegal to deny any aspect of the holocaust – “Holocaust Denial”. Note that Holocaust Denial censorship is illegal under
- the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 71;
- the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, Article 10;
- the UN Human Rights Committee statement of 2011.
The holocaust is the only historic event that one is not allowed to question, let alone deny – and is protected by law. Why is that? If the holocaust were based the truth, i.e. on facts, there would be no need for such protection. Neither the Jews nor any of the penalizing authorities have provided a reason beyond “to fight anti-Semitism” – apparently, other forms of racism and other historic events do not warrant any such protection.
The holocaust has been an extremely profitable business, as Norman Finkelstein describes in his book “The Holocaust Industry”. As the late former "israeli" Minister of Foreign Affairs once said: “There is no business like Shoah business”.
David Irving, a British historian, raised many valid questions and was surpressed by Jewish controlled media. Lots of questions around number of victims, chemical and gas chamber quantities, absence of written records etc
Yes, I know about David Irving; he is known for doing meticulous, accurate research – I guess that's why they hate him. He even did jail time in Austria for "holocaust denial".
i am constantly amazed at the thoroughness of Romanoff's work documenting the subject. below is a great audio fo Freedman's 1961 speech and a discussion of the Haavara Transfer Agreement between the Nazis and zionists to occupy Palestine. Nazism and zionism is one and the same - an undeserved racial superiority coupled with animalistic ruthlessness.
According to the European Jewish Congress, as of 2014, 360,000–400,000 Jews remained in Ukraine. (Wikipedia). Zelensky is a Jew. In 2019 he won presidential elections promising to mend ties with Russia.
In an outstanding example of Kol Nidre fundamental Jewish rule of life, he soon turned into a hellbent enemy of Russia.
Considering the followings:
For centuries the Jews craved for and dreamed of destroying orthodox Russia, which they achieved with the Judeo-Bolshevik revolution. Nevertheless, Russia is still standing, though in a diminished international stature, mostly thanks to its vast nuclear arsenal. The Ukrainian proxy war against Russia has been conceived to finish the job once and for all.
In hierarchical order:
At the top the “rabid Zionist rabbi” that exercises full control of “golemized” very powerful but brainless USA, with Jew Victoria Nuland as standard bearer at the vanguard.
Many commentators on the web keep denouncing how Zelensky is mercilessly sending fellow Ukrainians to the slaughter with total disregard for their life, but they miss the point, because Ukrainians are no fellows to the Jew Zelensky. They are just soulless speaking animals, with no more value than ordinary sheep.
Everyone knows how Zelensky’s henchmen keep grabbing on the streets whatever man they can put their hand on, in order to send them to the front.
Therefore the enlightening question is: HOW MANY JEWS HAVE BEEN SENT TO THE FRONT?
excellent question. zelensky's jewishness and his behavior is an angle that mainstream media will never explore but could be a fundamental motivation of his actions to sacrifice Ukraine on the altar of Russophobia. the most amazing thing is the ukrainian neonazi ultra nationalists who consider themselve a superior people happily let their youth sent to the grave by a jew - this says a lot of their self-claimed "superiority"...
Mr. Freedman’s speech is as powerful as a thermo-nuclear bomb. If even half of it is true, it makes world events so clear that modern history can be rationally explained by pulling on one thread. This is a devastating revelation.
I mean, the speech is all 100% true. The real issue is: do you support the jewish vision of the world or not? The jewish vision is anti-humanity, but pro-hedonism. Is that a good trade-off?
Since someone posted your article on chessgames.com, I'll share a comment made there.
Looking at this Benjamin H. Freedman article you posted.
<Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually.
The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation.>
Obviously if Britain had <stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation> there would have been no need for a German peace proposal. The British would have begged for terms.
Since the British did <not> beg for terms, we can infer, if we think for five seconds, that Britain did not <[stand] there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week’s food supply — and after that, starvation>.
This is why you fall for every conspiracy theory out there, <XXXXX>. You can't smell bull**** when it's piled ten feet high in front of your face.
Your guy's timeline is that Germany made a peace proposal in the summer of 1916 which England was seriously considering, but the Zionists in Germany went to England in October 1916 (how? Did they hijack a U-boat?) and told the English that they didn't have to take the offer, that they would bring in the United States on the British side if the British would give the Zionists Palestine after the war was over.
In reality, there was no German proposal for peace in the summer of 1916. There was a German proposal to open peace negotiations made on December 12, 1916 – after this supposed October 1916 Zionist embassy to England. Germany did not offer England a separate peace, as Freedman implies, and it definitely did <not> propose peace on a status quo ante basis. It did not propose peace from a position of strength; it proposed opening negotiations because it understood that the Entente Powers had greater manpower and resources, and it understood that time was not on its side.
OK, let's correct some of Freedman's other claims.
The Germans tried unrestricted submarine warfare three times during the war: March-August 1915; February-March 1916; and starting February 1, 1917, which (not the Zionists) brought the United States into the war. The British did not institute a transatlantic convoy system until April-May 1917. April 1917 was the height of German success: they sank 841,000 tons of shipping, and reduced British stocks to five weeks of grain supplies – Freedman garbles this. But April 1917 was when the United States entered the war, and convoys swiftly brought losses down to an acceptable level, as they were to do in the second war.
Verdun is on the Meuse, not the Somme. The Somme is a different river and a different battle. Both the Germans and the French suffered appalling casualties at Verdun, just as the Germans and the British both suffered appalling casualties at the Somme.
<I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Tsar. The Jews didn't like the Tsar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Tsarist regime.>
Now it is true that Jewish bankers in the US did not want to participate in loans to Tsarist Russia, for obvious reasons. But they were perfectly willing to participate in this loan to Britain and France.
<Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good.>
False. The American press, like the British press, portrayed the Germans as villains for their treatment of civilians during the invasion of Belgium in 1914 – correctly, in my view. German atrocities in Belgium were exaggerated, but they were very real, and did a lot to diminish sympathy for Germany long before the US entered the war.
<The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parcelling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration.>
The Balfour Declaration was <published in the British press> on November 9, 1917 and went around the world. It was printed on leaflets that were dropped in Germany and Austria, for God’s sake! The idea that the Germans found out about the Balfour Declaration during the Versailles negotiations in 1919 is ludicrous.
....
<Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.>
Yeah, you can disregard Benjamin H. Freedman’s testimony.
Now, it’s not like you’re charged with knowing every fact about World War I. I had to look some of this stuff up myself.
But if someone is telling you absolutely crazy things, you owe it to yourself to test what they’re telling you against reality:
-What was the military balance in 1916? Was Britain really out of ammunition and food?
-Could the Entente Powers really not borrow money in the United States during the war?
-Was the United States really pro-German until the Zionists flipped American public opinion overnight?
-Was the Balfour Declaration really kept secret from Germany (and the world) for two years?
-Could a bunch of German Zionists really have gone to England in the middle of the war?
And if one claim after another that this guy makes turns out to be false or simply incredible, then you can give the big claim (the Zionists got the US into the war) the credence it deserves.
Question 1 - If a "jew" can break any vow, pledge or agreement, does that only extend to "non-jews", meaning they have to keep their word when it is between themselves?
Question 2 - what if there is a written and signed contract, how do they break that and get away with it? Sorry if I'm sounding naive.
good questions. I don't know the exact talmudic theological nuaunces here. The jews do differentiate between jews and goyims. for example, on sabbath, jewish doctors are prohibited to save a goyim, but exception is made for jews. could be the case with kol nidre.
as for the value of written contracts, I think the best answers should come from israel's neighbors who entered into ceasefire and truces with it. after all, the motto of mossad is "by way of deception, thou shalt do war".
I don't know the specific talmudic source. Maybe AI assistants can provide some context there. The way Freedman described the practice certainly suggest it is a common practice regarding human to human relationship, not a man to god relationship.
the estimate is 5-8% of jewish population today is biblical jews - that number is ever decreasing. they are found in Palestine, Syria, Persia, Iraq and north Africa. many have been enticed to move to Israel over the years. After the Roman conquest, the jewish population dispersed into surrounding countries in the middle east.
I highly doubt the narrative that a large population of jews immigrated to Europe after the Roman conquest and were the ancestors of the Ashkenazi jews as most jews claim today. Why would some one immigrate to the land of the people who just destroyed your homeland and burned down your temple? Wouldn't you be heading into a disaster in a foreign land? in my view, the most likely scenario is the Ashkenazi jews today are Khazar-converted. Another proof is most Ashkenazi jews are from eastern Europe just like the Khazarians whose empire was located in modern Russia and Ukraine. Jews found in central and western europe mostly immigrated from the east.
Dear Sir,
Thanks for this post. My comment about your post is using the words written on May 27, 2021 by an author I like to quote also for his clarity and conciseness too:
I know of only one way to prevent the World War Three that is now imminent: make Israel pay for it. If in the final position of authority of one of the targeted nations, I would call in the Israeli ambassador and inform him that if my nation were forced into a war with the US, I would of course respond. However, my first retaliation would be not against the US but against Israel, that I would apply a necessary portion of my arsenal to ensure that Israel would remain uninhabitable for 500 years and that Satan’s Third Temple would never be built. It is my thesis that Israel is too important to these people to be sacrificed, and that faced with such a threat deemed credible, they would back off. With everything I know, I do not believe a third world war can be otherwise prevented.
I will of course be accused of anti-Semitism, but this is not about me; it is about a small handful of Jewish European bankers and industrialists who want a third world war to destroy the old order before the new can be installed. These people must be named and their objectives exposed. In any case, in a judicial debate of offending a few hundred people or starting a third world war, which is the greater crime?
What part will your country play in World War III? May 27, 2021
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/2595/
On this site you have also available at the beginning of the English archive
ESSENTIAL READING — The Truth about Khazars (Facts are Facts) Benjamin H. Freedman C 1954
ESSENTIAL READING —The Jewish Betrayal of Germany and the Cause of World War II — October 14, 2020
ESSENTIAL READING — The Jewish Declaration of War on Germany — The Economic Boycott of 1933
ESSENTIAL READING — ZIONISM — THE HIDDEN TIRANNY by Benjamin H. Freedman
ESSENTIAL READING — Jewish Responsibility for Both World Wars: A Speech by Benjamin Freedman
And to know at what extent the Khazarian Jews control the USA government please read:
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/The-Power-Behind-the-Throne-EN-.pdf
Written on May 11, 2023 but still more prevalent nowadays.
Reiterating my gratitude,
luisa
I have been a fan of Romanoff for years. He's a thorough researcher and I'm much more random in studying jewry.
This is a comment from Mr. L. Romanoff for you on your previous article once he cannot access this Substack page:
"I was a bit sorry to see the US-China trade negotiations begin so soon. I think the US needed a few months of empty shelves and 200% price increases to inject a bit of sincerity into their negotiations. The media tell us that US importers are now panicking to import the maximum possible amount of goods from China before the 90 days expires. This will mean the shelves will be full and the warehouses filled to the ceiling. They will import everything necessary for summer goods, back-to-school goods, Hallowe'en and Christmas. This left me with an uncomfortable thought. At the end of the 90 days, the US could give the Chinese a surprise list of further demands they know the Chinese will not be able to accept. They will then accuse the Chinese of being unreasonable, and impose the high tariffs again. With the warehouses full, the US will be much more able to withstand a long trade war and China would be out in the cold. I don't know how realistic this is but, if I were Donald Trump, this is what I would do.
Larry Romanoff
Email contact: 2186604556@qq.com
thanks for forwarding the note from Mr. Romanoff. I share his sentiment - China should have made the US wait a bit longer before agreeing to negotiate. But I assume the Chinese government wants to demonstrate goodwill and also abide by its pledge "the door is open for talk'. the other half of the pledge was "...but if you want to fight, we'll fight to the end". I have no doubt the Chinese government is sincere in that pledge.
that said, I am not overly concerned about Trump doublcrossing China. After all, the economic reality is what it is. Even if the US can stockpile for a year, nothing fundamental will change in the power dynamics. And China wouldn't waste the year and definitely will further proof its economy against US blackmail. At the end of the day, the US got nothing China wasn't prepared to give in Geneva. Trump, in effect, capitulated.
Luisa, I'm reading the text Truth About Khazars right now and it clears up so much for me. The evangelicals need to understand this.
Rest assured I'll read the rest next. Thank you.
Amazing find!
Prior to reading this article, I was aware of the major historical events referenced here, such as the Balfour Declaration or the boycott of German goods after organized Jewry declared war on Germany, but this is the first encounter I’ve had with a true insider’s perspective on the flow of events as purposefully driven by Jewish motives from their hand in the Treaty of Versailles through to WWII and, ultimately, the destruction of Germany. Thank you, Hua Bin, for injecting it into the conversation.
It’s unfortunate that people in the West are so thoroughly and ubiquitously indoctrinated with the false narrative of innocent Jews being methodically exterminated by German monsters for NO reason other than irrational hatred. This means most of them likely do not even possess the prerequisite knowledge to recognize the truth when neatly laid out before them, so reaching them is difficult.
This situation has literally caused a qualitative change in their thought such that trying to explain actual reality to them is equivalent to trying to explain what it’s like to perceive reality in four dimensions.
My point in this word salad is that the the speech given by this renegade Jew in 1961 is very insightful and lays out the motivations of both sides (Jews vs Germans) in a way that is still comprehensible by “normal” Westerners. While these normies would surely think what is conveyed can’t be true, the events mentioned and the facts surrounding them are easy enough to verify on the internet, so it makes the “why” a little easier to explain when discussing how things came to be as they are to others.
I personally found Mr. Bin’s post very insightful, and it added something to a conversation that has been raging for decades. It’s rare that I feel that way about any single source, let alone one that can be consumed in 10 minutes.
I appreciate your kind words. The real history is out there for people who are curious enough to find it. I always resort to a simple First Principle when reading history - does it make logical sense? Hence, I have doubts about many western mainstream narratives and "official" history, especially deep events like the world wars, JFK, 911, Fed, etc. Not all alternative accounts are necessarily true but it would be the height of naivety to buy in wholesale the stories fed to you by the deep state and its affiliated media. We should all know better by now after all the exposed lies
Oh Samuel Untermeyer the same man who financed the degenerate charlatan Scofield with his specious Bible and got it printed by all the worlds biggest presses with Rothschilds money which created the bloody idiots creed called evangelicalism and funnily stupid people like Mike Fuckabee the Christian Zionists? Christian Zionist-- what cockamamie bullshit is that? That temple is Nimrod's temple and the agenda of building that filthy temple is the same agenda that Nimrod had 4 or 5 millennia ago -waging war against the God of the bible. You see the cognitive dissonance in the theology of the whole thing - it is beyond stupid and the American white trash like the Shudras of India have IQs below 70 so that abomination of a religion exists. The other thing is that the core of the Jewish religion from when the world encounters them in Babylon Persia and Egypt is messianic vengeance and apocalytic war. Incredibly the Templar royal families of Europe especially the odious pedovore British one - supposed direct descendants of accursed Kings Saul and Solomon - let these Jews unleash apocalyptic war and messianic vengeance on the two primary warrior races of Europe - The Germans and Slavs who had outnumbered these Khazar barbarians by a factor of 100 to 1. Both these people face terminal depopulation as a result of these apocalyptic wars and messianic vengeance. The Jews by the time of Christ had avenged at scale the people of the civilisations of Babylon Persia and Egypt and so Christ and his apostles taught radical forgiveness to this loathsome godless crew and then they avenged Christ himself. Historically human civilisation had only two axes JudeoRoma and China. Unless China pulls humanity out of this dreadful existence of cycles of apocalyptic war and messianic vengeance human race has no hope. When will that happen? 2050-2150? It is civilisational and civilisation is a process. First certainly they have to build that filthy temple and unleash the greatest cycle of apocalyptic war and messianic vengeance ever. The period 2027-30 is key. Let's wait and hope.
the one and same Samuel Untermeyer who financed the fraud Cyrus Scofield. in fact, I intend to write a piece about Untermeyer who happened to write the legislation for Federal Reserve, created FTC, became the first lawyer to make a million dollars from a single case, etc. - the ultimate jewish fixer. from Untermeyer you get a long line of jewish fixers like Roy Cohn and Alan Dershowitz.
I think your historical perspective is on the mark. I would add the jews are set to take revenge on the Romans (i.e. white Europeans today) for conquering them and burning their temple. even if it would take 2 milliniums - the jews wouldnt let a grudge like this go. they do that by corrupting them from the inside and eventually subjugating them in a parasite/host relationship. this also sheds a new light on deindustrialization/financialization of the west which leads to a financier-led plutocracy where the jews excel and dominate. they have become the owner class in the west. the US is the New Jerusalem for them.
the jews tried to put their claw on China as well starting from the Opium War. the jewish opium smugglers such as the Sasoons ran the opium trade with both British India opium and the American Turkish opium. over 20,000 jews flooded Shanghai after fleeing Germany before WW2. but eventually they couldn't replicate their control the same way as in the west.
I agree the showdown between China and jew-led/owned west will come in the coming decade. That will decide the direction of human civilization for the next millinium.
I 100% agree with you, Hua Bin. The Christian West has pretty much already been bested by the chosen people, and much of the Muslim world is currently in their direct crosshairs. Yes, ultimately the great civilizational clash will be between two ancient cultures: Taoist/Confucianist China versus Talmudic diasporan Jews.
As the world seemingly moves towards some sort of New World Order, which Hobson's choice do you go with? A kinder, gentler neo Taoist/Confucianist surveillance control grid or a dark neo Talmudic Jew World Order?
I think we'll know the question in the coming decade. My optimistic side says China only needs to wait for the implosion of the jewish-controlled hegemon, without which the zionists are just pests. After all, parasites without a host have short lifespan. Still, China is gearing up for the worst case scenario. May we live in interesting times.
There was some maniac just the other day trying to rally hatred of certain countries/leaders because they are "the Roman Empire" and their goal is to destroy Israel. As if that's a reason to take against them! This person's diatribe seemed out of left field; now I learn it wasn't. Thanks for clearing that up.
Apparently I'm immoral because I think that anti-Israel aim is a net benefit.
How well do you know what all that is about? Frances Leader was the author of the specific diatribe. It seemed lunatic to me. I, like Cat, am interested in what you think--I wonder whether you might think this so-called "Roman Empire"
that FL is so against might in fact be a passel of good knights on horseback. Or at least benign, for those of us who like to live reasonable and not-corrupt lives.
Macron was and still is a Rothchild employee (literally working for Rothchild & Co. before his political career). He is a surrogate of jewish interests - no more and no less. whatever comes out of his mouth is spoonfed by his puppet-master. De Gaulle and Napoleon are rolling in their graves for the once and no more french glory.
The big issue about WW2 is the holocaust.
The Holocaust narrative is predicated on 3 pillars:
1. 6 million Jews were killed in concentration camps
2. they were gassed to death
3. there was a systemic intentionality from the Nazi regime to exterminate the Jews.
Below I made some remarks about each of these pillars.
➡️ 6 million Jews
Remarkably, there seems to be no consensus among historians about the number of Jews killed, even among Jewish historians.
Examples:
The late Raul Hilberg, Holocaust expert par excellence, estimated the number at 5.1 million in his magnum opus “The Destruction of the European Jews”.
The late Gerald Reitlinger's number is about 1 million less – see his book “The Final Solution”.
Note that the Final Solution (to the “Jewish Question”) was an answer to rid Germany, and eventually Europe, of Jews by transferring them elsewhere. Various potential destinations were considered, and eventually, due to the logistics of war, Eastern Europe was found to be the most practical one.
President Roosevelt (FDR), PM Churchill, and Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, Joseph Stalin, wrote their memoirs about WW2, a cumulative 7000 pages. None of them mentions mass killings nor gassings, even though they would have gleefully used the slightest indication of it to smear the German people.
The Red Cross visited the camps and in 1948 published their report, a 3-volume, 1600 page work, no mass killings are mentioned. The report puts total deaths in the 13 biggest camps at 271,000, ½ of whom were Jews, and most of the deaths were from louse-borne typhus or malnutrition from low calorie intake, no deaths due to gassing were reported. The total deaths was revised several times, with a final number at the 15 biggest camps put at 296,081 in 1993, say 300,000, i.e. 150,000 Jews.
At Auschwitz, which is now a museum/memorial, there was a plaque stating that 4 million people had been killed there, most of whom were Jews. An assumed (by me) proportion of 90% implies 3.6 million Jews. That number was included in the Six Million allegedly killed during WW2.
In 1991 the plaque was replaced by another one that put the total number at 1½ million, or 1.4 million Jews (90%). Thus the number of Jews allegedly killed in the Auschwitz concentration camp was reduced by 2.2 million, yet the total number deceased in concentration camps under German Nazi control remained at Six Million.
➡️ Six Million gassed to death
The gas in question is a cyanide gas known as Zyklon-B. Like in the U.S., the Nazi regime used the insecticide Zyklon-B to fumigate mattresses and new inmates’ clothes against typhus-carrying lice. The fumigation chambers still show the typical Prussian Blue staining of the brick & mortar walls.
However, chambers that allegedly served as homicidal gassing spaces do not show the Prussian Blue staining.
Talking about colors: the bodies of those who are put to death using cyanide turn pink/cherry-red. There are no reports of pink bodies.
Furthermore, no scientific, i.e. fact-based, evidence has ever been provided that proves the existence of homicidal gas chambers or that homicidal gassing even took place. OTOH, plenty of fact-based evidence has been provided that proves that what allegedly served as such chambers could not technically nor physically have been used for that purpose. American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter took samples, made blueprints and schematic drawings and exhaustively photographed the sites he visited, viz. Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek. He concluded that the alleged homicidal gas chambers were never used as such. There are other reports that debunk the narrative.
Raul Hilberg stated he knew of no scientific report that shows the existence of gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory.
Nowhere in a huge, permanent “Holocaust exhibition” spanning 2 floors in the London War Museum in Lambeth does it say or imply that cyanide gas chambers had people in them.
A can of the Zyklon-B insecticide is on display – and visitors are informed it was used in the delousing chamber.
➡️ Nazi regime's systemic intentionality to exterminate Jews
There is no record of an instruction issued by either Hitler or his immediate entourage for such policy. Nevertheless, the honorable Raul Hilberg found a way around to argue that the instruction existed: telepathy.
When asked in 1983 how the extermination of European Jewry took place
without an order, Hilberg replied:
> What began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus – mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.
Holocaust icon Anne Frank and her father Otto were both in the Auschwitz camp, both fell ill with typhus and were placed in the camp’s hospital. Anne recovered and agreed to be transferred to Bergen-Belsen when the Soviet troops were approaching Auschwitz. She died of typhus in Bergen-Belsen.
Her father was too ill to be transferred and stayed in the camp, and eventually returned to the Netherlands, where he profited from his daughter’s diary that, having been overlooked by the Nazis when they arrested the family in Amsterdam, surfaced miraculously after the war. Otto Frank died in 1980.
Primo Levi was in the camp’s sanatorium with scarlet fever when the Soviets arrived. After liberation he returned to Italy where he died in 1987.
If there was a policy to exterminate Jews, why give them medical treatment to save their lives?
➡️ Conclusion
The 3 pillars of the holocaust narrative do not seem to be based on facts. Despite this, many Western countries have made it illegal to deny any aspect of the holocaust – “Holocaust Denial”. Note that Holocaust Denial censorship is illegal under
- the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 71;
- the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, Article 10;
- the UN Human Rights Committee statement of 2011.
The holocaust is the only historic event that one is not allowed to question, let alone deny – and is protected by law. Why is that? If the holocaust were based the truth, i.e. on facts, there would be no need for such protection. Neither the Jews nor any of the penalizing authorities have provided a reason beyond “to fight anti-Semitism” – apparently, other forms of racism and other historic events do not warrant any such protection.
The holocaust has been an extremely profitable business, as Norman Finkelstein describes in his book “The Holocaust Industry”. As the late former "israeli" Minister of Foreign Affairs once said: “There is no business like Shoah business”.
David Irving, a British historian, raised many valid questions and was surpressed by Jewish controlled media. Lots of questions around number of victims, chemical and gas chamber quantities, absence of written records etc
Yes, I know about David Irving; he is known for doing meticulous, accurate research – I guess that's why they hate him. He even did jail time in Austria for "holocaust denial".
Ernst Zundel interview with Benjamin Freedman
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XD2FIYwfklWX
The audio of the interview is very difficult to understand. The transcript is here:
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Zundel-Freedman-1968-interview-transcript.pdf
Please share it, because it's a very important document and the written word is completely reliable.
This document is archived at
REMARKABLE LITERARY WORKS - in the section
ESSENTIAL READING
under the title
Zündel-Freedman 1968 interview transcript - New!
The url of this page is
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/20497/
i am constantly amazed at the thoroughness of Romanoff's work documenting the subject. below is a great audio fo Freedman's 1961 speech and a discussion of the Haavara Transfer Agreement between the Nazis and zionists to occupy Palestine. Nazism and zionism is one and the same - an undeserved racial superiority coupled with animalistic ruthlessness.
https://youtu.be/RyiVf3dOGB4?si=VdQ8ctNH56mW76d3
Excellent. Thank you so much. Good work!
From mario964@yandex.com
According to the European Jewish Congress, as of 2014, 360,000–400,000 Jews remained in Ukraine. (Wikipedia). Zelensky is a Jew. In 2019 he won presidential elections promising to mend ties with Russia.
In an outstanding example of Kol Nidre fundamental Jewish rule of life, he soon turned into a hellbent enemy of Russia.
Considering the followings:
For centuries the Jews craved for and dreamed of destroying orthodox Russia, which they achieved with the Judeo-Bolshevik revolution. Nevertheless, Russia is still standing, though in a diminished international stature, mostly thanks to its vast nuclear arsenal. The Ukrainian proxy war against Russia has been conceived to finish the job once and for all.
In hierarchical order:
At the top the “rabid Zionist rabbi” that exercises full control of “golemized” very powerful but brainless USA, with Jew Victoria Nuland as standard bearer at the vanguard.
Many commentators on the web keep denouncing how Zelensky is mercilessly sending fellow Ukrainians to the slaughter with total disregard for their life, but they miss the point, because Ukrainians are no fellows to the Jew Zelensky. They are just soulless speaking animals, with no more value than ordinary sheep.
Everyone knows how Zelensky’s henchmen keep grabbing on the streets whatever man they can put their hand on, in order to send them to the front.
Therefore the enlightening question is: HOW MANY JEWS HAVE BEEN SENT TO THE FRONT?
excellent question. zelensky's jewishness and his behavior is an angle that mainstream media will never explore but could be a fundamental motivation of his actions to sacrifice Ukraine on the altar of Russophobia. the most amazing thing is the ukrainian neonazi ultra nationalists who consider themselve a superior people happily let their youth sent to the grave by a jew - this says a lot of their self-claimed "superiority"...
Mr. Freedman’s speech is as powerful as a thermo-nuclear bomb. If even half of it is true, it makes world events so clear that modern history can be rationally explained by pulling on one thread. This is a devastating revelation.
I mean, the speech is all 100% true. The real issue is: do you support the jewish vision of the world or not? The jewish vision is anti-humanity, but pro-hedonism. Is that a good trade-off?
This excellent post does a good job of summarizing the key facts that explain what was really happening in the twentieth century.
All non-Jews have an urgent duty to inform ourselves about Judaism and its goals because our continued safety depends on it.
superb - i have forwarded it to all
多么有趣的历史，什么？
Great post!
This article is very interesting.
Since someone posted your article on chessgames.com, I'll share a comment made there.
Looking at this Benjamin H. Freedman article you posted.
<Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually.
The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation.>
Obviously if Britain had <stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation> there would have been no need for a German peace proposal. The British would have begged for terms.
Since the British did <not> beg for terms, we can infer, if we think for five seconds, that Britain did not <[stand] there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week’s food supply — and after that, starvation>.
This is why you fall for every conspiracy theory out there, <XXXXX>. You can't smell bull**** when it's piled ten feet high in front of your face.
Your guy's timeline is that Germany made a peace proposal in the summer of 1916 which England was seriously considering, but the Zionists in Germany went to England in October 1916 (how? Did they hijack a U-boat?) and told the English that they didn't have to take the offer, that they would bring in the United States on the British side if the British would give the Zionists Palestine after the war was over.
In reality, there was no German proposal for peace in the summer of 1916. There was a German proposal to open peace negotiations made on December 12, 1916 – after this supposed October 1916 Zionist embassy to England. Germany did not offer England a separate peace, as Freedman implies, and it definitely did <not> propose peace on a status quo ante basis. It did not propose peace from a position of strength; it proposed opening negotiations because it understood that the Entente Powers had greater manpower and resources, and it understood that time was not on its side.
OK, let's correct some of Freedman's other claims.
The Germans tried unrestricted submarine warfare three times during the war: March-August 1915; February-March 1916; and starting February 1, 1917, which (not the Zionists) brought the United States into the war. The British did not institute a transatlantic convoy system until April-May 1917. April 1917 was the height of German success: they sank 841,000 tons of shipping, and reduced British stocks to five weeks of grain supplies – Freedman garbles this. But April 1917 was when the United States entered the war, and convoys swiftly brought losses down to an acceptable level, as they were to do in the second war.
Verdun is on the Meuse, not the Somme. The Somme is a different river and a different battle. Both the Germans and the French suffered appalling casualties at Verdun, just as the Germans and the British both suffered appalling casualties at the Somme.
<I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Tsar. The Jews didn't like the Tsar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Tsarist regime.>
This is false. In 1915 the British and French secured a $500 million loan in the United States – the largest loan in the history of the world up to that time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-French_Financial_Commission
Now it is true that Jewish bankers in the US did not want to participate in loans to Tsarist Russia, for obvious reasons. But they were perfectly willing to participate in this loan to Britain and France.
<Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good.>
False. The American press, like the British press, portrayed the Germans as villains for their treatment of civilians during the invasion of Belgium in 1914 – correctly, in my view. German atrocities in Belgium were exaggerated, but they were very real, and did a lot to diminish sympathy for Germany long before the US entered the war.
<The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parcelling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration.>
The Balfour Declaration was <published in the British press> on November 9, 1917 and went around the world. It was printed on leaflets that were dropped in Germany and Austria, for God’s sake! The idea that the Germans found out about the Balfour Declaration during the Versailles negotiations in 1919 is ludicrous.
....
<Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.>
Yeah, you can disregard Benjamin H. Freedman’s testimony.
Now, it’s not like you’re charged with knowing every fact about World War I. I had to look some of this stuff up myself.
But if someone is telling you absolutely crazy things, you owe it to yourself to test what they’re telling you against reality:
-What was the military balance in 1916? Was Britain really out of ammunition and food?
-Could the Entente Powers really not borrow money in the United States during the war?
-Was the United States really pro-German until the Zionists flipped American public opinion overnight?
-Was the Balfour Declaration really kept secret from Germany (and the world) for two years?
-Could a bunch of German Zionists really have gone to England in the middle of the war?
And if one claim after another that this guy makes turns out to be false or simply incredible, then you can give the big claim (the Zionists got the US into the war) the credence it deserves.
The Kol Nidre does not say that.
I am educated at Germany, hence, everything said here is absolutely new information for me. I feel like I'm enlightened.
Thanks for sharing this valuable knowledge.
It seems like being pro-Israel equal to a deficit of true information.
Question 1 - If a "jew" can break any vow, pledge or agreement, does that only extend to "non-jews", meaning they have to keep their word when it is between themselves?
Question 2 - what if there is a written and signed contract, how do they break that and get away with it? Sorry if I'm sounding naive.
good questions. I don't know the exact talmudic theological nuaunces here. The jews do differentiate between jews and goyims. for example, on sabbath, jewish doctors are prohibited to save a goyim, but exception is made for jews. could be the case with kol nidre.
as for the value of written contracts, I think the best answers should come from israel's neighbors who entered into ceasefire and truces with it. after all, the motto of mossad is "by way of deception, thou shalt do war".
From Wikipedia, the motto for the CIA is:
"The Work of a Nation. The Center of Intelligence."
Unofficial motto: "And you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32).
Interesting contrast between that and Mossad's motto....
I don't know the specific talmudic source. Maybe AI assistants can provide some context there. The way Freedman described the practice certainly suggest it is a common practice regarding human to human relationship, not a man to god relationship.
the estimate is 5-8% of jewish population today is biblical jews - that number is ever decreasing. they are found in Palestine, Syria, Persia, Iraq and north Africa. many have been enticed to move to Israel over the years. After the Roman conquest, the jewish population dispersed into surrounding countries in the middle east.
I highly doubt the narrative that a large population of jews immigrated to Europe after the Roman conquest and were the ancestors of the Ashkenazi jews as most jews claim today. Why would some one immigrate to the land of the people who just destroyed your homeland and burned down your temple? Wouldn't you be heading into a disaster in a foreign land? in my view, the most likely scenario is the Ashkenazi jews today are Khazar-converted. Another proof is most Ashkenazi jews are from eastern Europe just like the Khazarians whose empire was located in modern Russia and Ukraine. Jews found in central and western europe mostly immigrated from the east.