The group "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" concluded the official narrative of structural collapse defies all known physics regarding the structural components and design of the towers. Additionally, the "9/11 Commission" refused to accept as evidence nearly all material(s) that would contradict their "official" findings...something akin to the Warren Commission regarding JFK. Only a fool would accept the findings of these orchestrated shows for the public.
While the scale and devastation of 9/11 were extraordinary, the events do not defy physical laws. Investigations emphasize that the collapses resulted from identifiable factors like structural damage, fire, and material failure. Critical questioning is healthy, but it should be grounded in technical literacy and evidence. Sensitivity to the human tragedy remains paramount when discussing these events
What hasn't been investigated is the asbestos issue:
---
The Twin Towers had large amounts of asbestos fireproofing which would have necessitated costly removal had they remained standing. The exact amount and distribution of the asbestos in the Towers remains unclear, like other details of the buildings' construction and history, but the evidence suggests that the cost of its removal may have rivaled the value of the buildings themselves.
The group "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" concluded the official narrative of structural collapse defies all known physics regarding the structural components and design of the towers. Additionally, the "9/11 Commission" refused to accept as evidence nearly all material(s) that would contradict their "official" findings...something akin to the Warren Commission regarding JFK. Only a fool would accept the findings of these orchestrated shows for the public.
This from DeepSeek
Conclusion
While the scale and devastation of 9/11 were extraordinary, the events do not defy physical laws. Investigations emphasize that the collapses resulted from identifiable factors like structural damage, fire, and material failure. Critical questioning is healthy, but it should be grounded in technical literacy and evidence. Sensitivity to the human tragedy remains paramount when discussing these events
Poor effort, could try harder😇
Not very impressive.
What answers did you get on JFK?
Inconvenient facts about 9/11 — "9/11 Unveiled" FREE BOOK (Nixon advisor: best, short summary), 180,000+ downloaded
https://www.twf.org/News/Y2024/1216-AvoidingHardTruths.pdf
What hasn't been investigated is the asbestos issue:
---
The Twin Towers had large amounts of asbestos fireproofing which would have necessitated costly removal had they remained standing. The exact amount and distribution of the asbestos in the Towers remains unclear, like other details of the buildings' construction and history, but the evidence suggests that the cost of its removal may have rivaled the value of the buildings themselves.
---
https://www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/asbestos.html