Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Walt King's avatar

Exactly. It's because their jobs depend on it.

Remember this famous exchange.

In February 1996, Andrew Marr interviewed Noam Chomsky on the BBC’s The Big Idea.

One of the most illuminating exchanges during the interview was the following:

Marr: “How can you know I’m self-censoring?”

Chomsky: “I’m not saying you’re self-censoring. I’m sure you believe everything you say. But what I’m saying is if you believed something different you wouldn’t be sitting where you’re sitting.”

Expand full comment
Mastameta's avatar

There are stretches of Chinese dynastic history in which temperatures were higher than they are today, so climate change cannot conclusively said to be anthropogenic. I personally think the claim about climate change distracts from the larger point of the article.

In any case, I think the question about why smart people think stupid things in the US ruling class has little to do with individuals but with instutitions. Take for example the revolving door between military brass and the boards of weapons manufacturers, which in turn fund politicians and think tanks, which in turn reinforce establishment thinking about 'peer rivals'. And the intelligence agents that double as public experts in mainstream media. This nepotistic overlapping of circles upon circles is mirrored by the super-national NATO and Brussel structures that control the governance of Europe.

Just getting a peek at USAID funding gives a hint of how many instutitions are deeply interconnected in ways so byzantine that even the most steadfast auditor would be hard pressed to map it all. It is a huge echo chamber in which no one can see the walls that enclose it. And it is designed that way, otherwise why split the hydra into the CIA, NED, USAID, the state dept, etc. This megolithic but impossible to fully comprehend superstructure is what these 'smart individuals' abide in. There are few individuals so smart that they can transcend the biases of their society and instutitions. We usually just call such persons madmen.

As for the conventionally smart people, let's not forget that places like Yale are recruitment grounds for the CIA. I forget the details of Sullivan's CV but he fits the profile aptly and the Clintons have never stopped raving about how smart Sullivan is and how he is the future of the elite class. Yet everything out of his mouth is a platitude, or some silly lie that would make even the most mediocre mind wince when trying to pass it off as a truth.

Expand full comment
47 more comments...

No posts